|
Only have a minute? Listen instead
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
HARLINGEN — After 34 years, city officials are taking over operations at Harlingen’s animal shelter amid some commissioners’ concerns costs could climb over projections.
After Thursday, the city’s annual $400,000 contract with the Rio Grande Valley Humane Society, which had operated the shelter since 1988, expired a month after officials terminated the agreement, claiming the “no-kill” agency breached its contract when it refused to take in Harlingen residents’ pets along with some animal control officers’ intake requests.
Officials are taking on the operation after they failed to receive proposals to run the shelter after contacting the Laguna Madre Humane Society, Brownsville Animal Defense, the Palm Valley Humane Society and No Kill RGV.
Last week, commissioners agreed to pull $365,937 from the city’s general fund budget to foot payroll for an 11-member staff that will operate the shelter.
At City Hall, City Manager Gabriel Gonzalez said he planned to run the shelter for the budgeted amount.
As part of the transition, officials plan to close the shelter for one to two weeks while crews clean, make repairs and buy equipment, he said.
During that time, animal control officers will be taking strays to a Cameron County shelter, he said.
“It’s going well,” Gonzalez said, referring to the transition. “We’re making job offers to folks.”
Officials expect some staff to start work soon, helping to make the transition, he said.
But during a meeting, Commissioners Michael Mezmar and Frank Morales said they’re concerned the shelter’s operating costs could climb higher than its $367,937 payroll budget.
“You’re not pricing in a veterinarian; you’re not pricing in food; you’re not pricing in parvo, leukemia tests; you’re not pricing in vaccines,” Mezmar said during the Jan. 10 meeting. “So the cost will be what? Double?”
Then Morales said costs could “double or quadruple” the city’s annual $400,000 payment to the Humane Society.
In response, Mayor Norma Sepulveda told commissioners they had supported plans to take over the shelter’s operations while backing the decision to terminate the Humane Society’s contract.
“I understand the discussion and I think that’s a healthy discussion,” Sepulveda told commissioners, referring to questions stemming from the shelter’s operating costs.
“I just want to remind the commission that it was the consensus of the entire commission to move forward in this direction, so we need to support staff in this endeavor because this is the direction that we are going, and I encourage we have it on the agenda once we have those final numbers that we discussed,” she told commissioners.
“This is months and months of trying to collaborate, having meetings with the commission — and every single commissioner understood that this is the direction that we are going,” Sepulveda said. “So to deviate from this now — it’s not the right time.”
”This was a consensus of the commission, that we would go out for RFQs — we did that; that we would not renew the contract with the Humane Society, and that was a consensus of the commission,” she said. “So to sit here and say otherwise is completely inappropriate because it gives the wrong impression to the community. As much as we wanted to move forward with the Humane Society, they had an opportunity to apply for the RFQ. Have they applied? That did not happen.”
During discussion, Gonzalez said officials plan to use $180,000 which the Harlingen Community Improvement Board set aside to fund veterinarian spay and neuter services.
“We probably won’t bring one on board — a veterinarian — but we’ll work with them to actually issue vouchers for spay or neuter for the animals,” he said.
Meanwhile, Sepulveda proposed requesting the Community Improvement Board fund a total of $200,000.
“But nonetheless, the cost will be much higher than presented by the city, whether it comes from city tax dollars or it comes from (the Community Improvement Board), which is city tax dollars,” Mezmar said. “So the costs will be significantly higher than thought of and presented.”
Amid discussion, Shannon Harvill, the city’s environmental health director who will be overseeing the shelter’s operations, said plans call for a veterinarian to come to the shelter several times a week “to do animal assessments, to evaluate animals, to assist us in making recommendations if that animal is sick, helping to tell us what is wrong with that animal — is it possible to treat it relatively inexpensively or is it going to be something that’s going to cost thousands of dollars to try to treat medically? We also want to talk about spay-neuter.”
Meanwhile, Sepulveda said some veterinarians are volunteering their services.
“The veterinarian is not going to be an employee,” she said. “I do believe we’ve had some reach out that want to volunteer services as well, so probably we have a vet that will come and help with that at no cost, and we fully expect the shelter to also open its doors to volunteers. A ton of folks have been reaching out, excited about the opportunity to volunteer.”
During discussion, Mezmar questioned whether officials planned to buy drugs to conduct tests for diseases such as parvo and feline leukemia.
“We’re going to have to evaluate the cost of those tests,” Harvill told him. “We want to be responsible. We want to do what we can for those animals but as with everything, we have a budget.”
The city’s operation of the shelter comes months after officials began requesting the Humane Society present detailed financial information to determine whether the agency used the city’s $400,000 annual payment to help Harlingen residents.
When the Humane Society presented some information weeks after an October deadline, officials questioned whether nearly $1 million was spent on payroll.
Since 1988, the Rio Grande Valley Humane Society, under its former name, the Harlingen Humane Society, had operated the shelter.
About four years ago, the Humane Society, under past Executive Director Luis Quintanilla and a revamped board of directors, turned the shelter into a “no-kill” operation, slashing its numbers of euthanasia procedures.
In November, Quintanilla resigned after about four years on the job.
