Political correctness hypocrisy

Will the political correctness gone amok ever cease? Personally, I seriously doubt it.

Jack Ayoub’s letter, “Asking Castillo some questions”, was perfectly timed to coincide with the pro and counter protests over the removal of a Robert E. Lee statue in Charlottesville, Va.

Will the removal of this statue be enough to appease Democrats, liberals, socialists, communists, Black Lives Matter, etc., etc.?

Since Robert E. Lee is buried at Arlington National Cemetery, will leftists demand that his Confederate remains be moved to a different location?

And since George Washington was a slave owner, will Washington D.C. and the state of Washington have to be renamed to satisfy the liberal left?

Will Democrats, liberals, and leftists, some time in the future demand that the Washington Memorial be torn down? Wouldn’t surprise me one bit.

What about all the cities, towns, streets, and schools named after presidents that owned slaves?

Besides George Washington, the following presidents owned slaves at one time, Jefferson, Monroe, Jackson, Van Buren, Harrison, Tyler, Polk, Taylor, Johnson, and Grant.

What about anything named after racists presidents, like Democrat Woodrow Wilson?

Talk about political correctness gone amok, the Centennial School District in Portland, Oregon, is in the process of renaming three schools named after the Lynch family, because the word “lynch” is supposedly offensive to some students and residents.

Never mind that the Lynch family, who were pioneers in the area, donated the land for a single room schoolhouse in the 1880’s.

Will Corpus Christi, which is Latin for, “body of Christ” or Santa Fe, which means “Holy Faith” in Spanish, have to be changed when some liberal atheist complains?

I know it offends Democrats like G. Campos, Ken Cantine, Juan Gonzalez, etc, etc, but here’s the thing that I totally don’t get.

Because of its racist history, why does the Democratic Party still exist?

From a 7/22/2014 National Review article, Setting the record straight on Jim Crow: “… the political enforcement of Jim Crow was entirely in Democratic hands. The Ku Klux Klan functioned as the paramilitary wing of the Democratic Party, and it was used to drive Republicans out of the South after the Civil War”.

The Klan was part of the Democratic Party from after the Civil War, until the late 1960s, when the Democratic party went full Socialist.

For those that claim that I don’t know my history, please Google Wikipedia and read: Lynching in the United States; Jim Crow Laws; the Ku Klux Klan.

And if anyone thinks for one second that white supremacists have a monopoly on racism, what about Black Lives Matter?

And why do the Clintons live in one of the wealthiest and “whitest” towns in America?

Google and read: The Clintons and their racists mentors.

The hypocrisy of the left never ceases to amaze me.

N. Rodriguez Harlingen